Friday, August 31, 2012

[獨立] [當今讀者來函] 真的結束了嗎?

真的要结束了吗? 

作者/邓婉晴 2012年08月30日 12:26:28 pm

邓婉晴】要结束了吗?

七年前开始念媒体研究系,在见识及理解到传统媒体因垄断偏颇而失去的平衡深度报导后,《当今大马》及《独立新闻在线》就一直是吮吸新闻与评论观点,甚至是揣摸与学习新闻该如何报导,人物该如何深入访问的管道。

回想起自己对《当今》与《独立》新闻的阅读模式,《当今》是要追踪即时新闻时登录的第一个地方。其利落的页面与文风,犀利果敢的红字,滚动报道的方式总是让人能很快地得到所要的资讯。

至于《独立》,则是要了解一个议题,做研究报告的好帮手。《独立》很细心,蓝色的页面很温和,而且经常在连续性的报道末端附上其他新闻的连接,让半路跟进的读者能更了解事情的来龙去脉。《文库》做的新闻整合,像一部部现代通史,戏的起承转合,一目了然。

必须提的是,《独立》的另一珍贵资产,是后来增设的《独立文艺志》。虽然曲高和寡,其中一些篇章也有来自香港的味道,但在马来西亚这片文化沙漠,这些连结文化、戏曲、艺术与学术的文章,对有兴趣的人读来是一大享受。比起《当今》的及时雨之用,《独立》于我有更多元及文化灌溉的意义。闲来无事随手看一两篇错过 的《文化志》及《专栏》,早已成为习惯。

城市精神是什么?

真的要结束了吗?

网络及脸书的普及,常让我们理所当然地觉得免费的资讯是一种理所当然。殊不知即便是脸书广传的所谓恶搞及即时新闻,背后也是有很多人,花了很多时间在整理与 书写,上传与回应。文字是一种创作,不管以任何形式出现,他都值得让人以基本的尊重和礼貌对待。所谓礼貌,即如转载说明出处,不断章取义等。然而今天看到 的局面,是大部分的人冀望从网路得到更劲爆的资讯,却不太想也很少意识到,这些耕地也需要有心人一起去灌溉,去付出。

走过世界多座城市,常常在想,这座孕育自己的城市,精神到底是什么?有没有一个核心价值,是足以让绝大部分的人,群起不惜一切代价去捍卫去守护的?我们希望 能有个干净的街道,却默许身边前后的人在眼前把烟蒂纸袋丢在街上。我们知道电动火车的女性车厢规定只供女性,却有很少人会主动去提醒或无知或装傻的男性乘 客,这里不适合他们。

多年的教育只教会我们在一堆堆钢骨水泥中关心自己,保护自己,不读世界历史,缺乏国际常识,对周遭发生的事不痛不痒、不闻不问。纵然有时会心疼会愤怒,但也只限于一瞬间。叹息之后,生活依旧,好象少了些什么,却也没什么,什么也没有。

于是在马来亚联邦独立55年后的831,有一条老街,一个老社区因发展而面目全非,一家百年茶馆即将结束营业,一盏独立新闻之火熄灭。还有一些坟山被毁,一 些村庄将被毒害。在《独立》读着玉壶轩茶楼的故事,不胜唏嘘,欲说还休。除了悲情,我们还能做什么?55年,我们到底发展了什么?

从没让读者失望

末了,想要借此机会感谢前总庄老师在2008年曾主动联络要我帮忙当《独立》的特约记者。还记得第一次去马华公会采访叶炳汉记者会,就连他的长相也不大清 楚,就胆粗粗大喇喇地写了一篇新闻,还被赞美一番。之后在出国深造前在《独立》当了一个星期的全职记者,庄老师第一天就指示我一个人去采访国会新闻。因为 工作量与压力实在太可怕,也让我从此对全职当记者的理想幻灭(哈哈)。

也因为有总编的胆识与魄力,在独立留下的,都是铁铮铮为了一个强大的理想,甘心把生活都奉献给工作的人。为此我向你们致以最高的敬意。记得在《当今》看过一 篇新闻,是前一晚半夜四点多上载的,在电子媒体必须持有的即时性与高效率,剖析新闻的深度与广度上,你们从来没有让读者失望。

也多亏有《独立》与《当今》这两家电子媒体,让从中学投稿平面媒体就一直不获刊登的我,终于有一个能容纳异见的平台,让那些无法被平面媒体接纳的想法见光,甚至引起共鸣。这些无形的鼓励与支持,对一个嗜字的人来说,重于泰山。

我也相信,《独立》与《当今》还有其他异议媒体,在马来西亚所做过的一切努力,那些独立又坚毅的声音,会一直缭绕在人们的心中,慢慢扩散。在这个人文道义廉价的时代,你们种下的文字与精神,有一天,会遍地开花的。

我是如此相信着。祝福《独立》团队的每一员,祝福深深。


--------------------------------------------------

草稿于8月初得知獨立即將于月底熄燈之後。之後忙於工作,流浪澳洲10天,回來后29/30日在3小時内完稿。

原稿題目:寄語《獨立》

http://www.merdekareview.com/news_v2.php?n=26509  (38 likes, 12 comments updated 20121007)

http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/207532   (35 likes 1 tweet 1 comment updated 20121007)


Read more!

[獨立] [當今讀者來函] 真的結束了嗎?

真的要结束了吗? 

作者/邓婉晴 2012年08月30日 12:26:28 pm

邓婉晴】要结束了吗?

七年前开始念媒体研究系,在见识及理解到传统媒体因垄断偏颇而失去的平衡深度报导后,《当今大马》及《独立新闻在线》就一直是吮吸新闻与评论观点,甚至是揣摸与学习新闻该如何报导,人物该如何深入访问的管道。

回想起自己对《当今》与《独立》新闻的阅读模式,《当今》是要追踪即时新闻时登录的第一个地方。其利落的页面与文风,犀利果敢的红字,滚动报道的方式总是让人能很快地得到所要的资讯。

至于《独立》,则是要了解一个议题,做研究报告的好帮手。《独立》很细心,蓝色的页面很温和,而且经常在连续性的报道末端附上其他新闻的连接,让半路跟进的读者能更了解事情的来龙去脉。《文库》做的新闻整合,像一部部现代通史,戏的起承转合,一目了然。

必须提的是,《独立》的另一珍贵资产,是后来增设的《独立文艺志》。虽然曲高和寡,其中一些篇章也有来自香港的味道,但在马来西亚这片文化沙漠,这些连结文化、戏曲、艺术与学术的文章,对有兴趣的人读来是一大享受。比起《当今》的及时雨之用,《独立》于我有更多元及文化灌溉的意义。闲来无事随手看一两篇错过 的《文化志》及《专栏》,早已成为习惯。

城市精神是什么?

真的要结束了吗?

网络及脸书的普及,常让我们理所当然地觉得免费的资讯是一种理所当然。殊不知即便是脸书广传的所谓恶搞及即时新闻,背后也是有很多人,花了很多时间在整理与 书写,上传与回应。文字是一种创作,不管以任何形式出现,他都值得让人以基本的尊重和礼貌对待。所谓礼貌,即如转载说明出处,不断章取义等。然而今天看到 的局面,是大部分的人冀望从网路得到更劲爆的资讯,却不太想也很少意识到,这些耕地也需要有心人一起去灌溉,去付出。

走过世界多座城市,常常在想,这座孕育自己的城市,精神到底是什么?有没有一个核心价值,是足以让绝大部分的人,群起不惜一切代价去捍卫去守护的?我们希望 能有个干净的街道,却默许身边前后的人在眼前把烟蒂纸袋丢在街上。我们知道电动火车的女性车厢规定只供女性,却有很少人会主动去提醒或无知或装傻的男性乘 客,这里不适合他们。

多年的教育只教会我们在一堆堆钢骨水泥中关心自己,保护自己,不读世界历史,缺乏国际常识,对周遭发生的事不痛不痒、不闻不问。纵然有时会心疼会愤怒,但也只限于一瞬间。叹息之后,生活依旧,好象少了些什么,却也没什么,什么也没有。

于是在马来亚联邦独立55年后的831,有一条老街,一个老社区因发展而面目全非,一家百年茶馆即将结束营业,一盏独立新闻之火熄灭。还有一些坟山被毁,一 些村庄将被毒害。在《独立》读着玉壶轩茶楼的故事,不胜唏嘘,欲说还休。除了悲情,我们还能做什么?55年,我们到底发展了什么?

从没让读者失望

末了,想要借此机会感谢前总庄老师在2008年曾主动联络要我帮忙当《独立》的特约记者。还记得第一次去马华公会采访叶炳汉记者会,就连他的长相也不大清 楚,就胆粗粗大喇喇地写了一篇新闻,还被赞美一番。之后在出国深造前在《独立》当了一个星期的全职记者,庄老师第一天就指示我一个人去采访国会新闻。因为 工作量与压力实在太可怕,也让我从此对全职当记者的理想幻灭(哈哈)。

也因为有总编的胆识与魄力,在独立留下的,都是铁铮铮为了一个强大的理想,甘心把生活都奉献给工作的人。为此我向你们致以最高的敬意。记得在《当今》看过一 篇新闻,是前一晚半夜四点多上载的,在电子媒体必须持有的即时性与高效率,剖析新闻的深度与广度上,你们从来没有让读者失望。

也多亏有《独立》与《当今》这两家电子媒体,让从中学投稿平面媒体就一直不获刊登的我,终于有一个能容纳异见的平台,让那些无法被平面媒体接纳的想法见光,甚至引起共鸣。这些无形的鼓励与支持,对一个嗜字的人来说,重于泰山。

我也相信,《独立》与《当今》还有其他异议媒体,在马来西亚所做过的一切努力,那些独立又坚毅的声音,会一直缭绕在人们的心中,慢慢扩散。在这个人文道义廉价的时代,你们种下的文字与精神,有一天,会遍地开花的。

我是如此相信着。祝福《独立》团队的每一员,祝福深深。


--------------------------------------------------

草稿于8月初得知獨立即將于月底熄燈之後。之後忙於工作,流浪澳洲10天,回來后29/30日在3小時内完稿。

原稿題目:寄語《獨立》

http://www.merdekareview.com/news_v2.php?n=26509  (38 likes, 12 comments updated 20121007)

http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/207532   (35 likes 1 tweet 1 comment updated 20121007)


Read more!

Friday, August 10, 2012

[The Rocket] The Sweet Rebel: Remembering Fan Yew Teng

The Sweet Rebel: Remembering Fan Yew Teng
By Tung Wan Qing

          
  
Before writing this article, I did not know Mr Fan in person or any of his works. I was not even born when he was charged under the infamous Sedition Act. His crime? He published a speech in the second issue of The Rocket in 1975 by the then-Penang DAP chairman, Dr Ooi Kee Saik, in which Dr Ooi welcomed Lim Kit Siang’s release from ISA.
But here I am, sitting in a room beside the DAP headquarters, writing an article for The Rocket in 2012, reading books and tributes about Fan’s life, his ideas, and his stories.
What makes a hero a hero? What makes a warrior a warrior? In films, we might be fascinated by Thor who can use his extraordinary power to protect the world, or Spiderman who has endless strength. But in reality, a hero in one’s heart is always a humble and simple man.
Heroes are often hopelessly idealistic, regardless of how many times have their ideas been demonized and flung aside. They are morally principled enough to strive their whole lives to uphold it, even at the cost of personal loss and sacrifice.
A few descriptions reoccur in “The Sweet Rebel: Remembering Fan Yew Teng”, a book edited by his twin daughter Pauline and Lilianne Fan, to commemorate the first anniversary of his passing. Fan was repeatedly described as the “Beacon of Light”, grassroot leader, principled, intellectual, daring, fearless, truly a simple man with a big heart.

Fan Yew Teng was a two-term Member of Parliament in Kampar and Menglembu, as well as Selangor assemblyman for Petaling Jaya. He was the editor of “The Educator”, the official organ of the National Union of Teachers (NUT), and later editor of The Rocket. He was also the co-organizer of the 1967 nationwide teachers' strike which demanded equal pay for female teachers, better housing and medical benefits, and pension after retirement for all teachers.
When Lim Kit Siang was detained under the Internal Security Act in 1969, Fan served as acting DAP Secretary-General, exercising the powers even before Lim, to keep the party from falling apart in the post-May 13 climate.
Fan later left DAP over differences in principle, yet he never turned his back on any injustice happening in Malaysia. He participated in a 1998 international forum against Lim Guan Eng’s unjust imprisonment.
When it came to race, Fan was truly “color blind”. He was amongst the first people to connect PAS to the Chinese community since the early eighties. He was also a well-known columnist in Harakah and Aliran.
Internationally, he founded Suaram and was concerned with many international issues, including the release of Aung San Suu Kyi. For him, human rights and the dignity of humanity cut across race and religion.
According to Petaling Jaya City Councillor Richard Yeoh, Fan’s victory over then Education Minister Dr. Mahathir in the Great Economic Debate at University Malaya in 1974, was probably the cause for Dr. Mahathir to withdraw universities’ autonomy with the amended University and University College Act (still in effect today).
Despite his huge achievements and contributions, one of the deepest impressions that Mr. Fan left to his beloved friends from all over the world, was his fondness for his typewriter, pipe and bicycle.
How could such a simple family man become a political target, be charged for an article he published in The Rocket, removed as the Member of Parliament and denied his parliamentary pension? I believe this was simply because Fan was true to himself.
Fan’s legacy was his big heart and his deep compassion to social justice. One does not have to know him in person to feel his passion and his ideas for a better Malaysia and a better world. This is what connected him and other giants like Lim Kit Siang, who have been and are still working selflessly for this cause.
Reading “The Sweet Rebel” made me feel how many lives that Fan impacted. I remembered Lim Kit Siang’s expression when he was sitting at the front row at the book launch of The Sweet Rebel: Remembering Fan Yew Teng. He was ever so calm and composed.
Lim looked at Fan’s face projected on the main screen backdrop, and he flipped through a copy of the book displayed on the table. He listened attentively when Pauline Fan and Ambiga gave their speeches; in the middle of the tribute he took out his glasses and wiped his eyes. In those 5 seconds as the camera focused on him, Lim raised his head up again as resolute as ever, with his glasses perched on his nose. That was the face of a man who lost a comrade and friend.
Fan may have felt that he had not done enough to make the world a better place. Even lying on the hospital bed, his concern was how to help others escape from suffering. Malaysia would not have come this far without the efforts and contributions by Fan and other first generation Malaysian rebels.
What makes a rebel a rebel? A strong, fearless, and principled soul. A great mind, great heart, great vision. As much as we mourn for his soul, Fan’s wishes for a better Malaysia are still valid today: “For how long more are Malaysians to live with fear and loathing? Afraid about the collapse of public safety even in broad daylight and disgusted by rising inflation and galloping corruption. How much longer? Surely it is in the hands of the Malaysian people themselves.” (in Harakah, December 2007).
I think that the best and only way to remember Fan Yew Teng, is to continue his mission to fulfil his dreams and ensure that the spirit of a Malaysian Malaysia lives on. 

This article was published at The Rocket, August 2012

Genta Media's official website - Editorial Diary 03/03 
Read more!

[The Rocket] The Sweet Rebel: Remembering Fan Yew Teng

The Sweet Rebel: Remembering Fan Yew Teng
By Tung Wan Qing

          
  
Before writing this article, I did not know Mr Fan in person or any of his works. I was not even born when he was charged under the infamous Sedition Act. His crime? He published a speech in the second issue of The Rocket in 1975 by the then-Penang DAP chairman, Dr Ooi Kee Saik, in which Dr Ooi welcomed Lim Kit Siang’s release from ISA.
But here I am, sitting in a room beside the DAP headquarters, writing an article for The Rocket in 2012, reading books and tributes about Fan’s life, his ideas, and his stories.
What makes a hero a hero? What makes a warrior a warrior? In films, we might be fascinated by Thor who can use his extraordinary power to protect the world, or Spiderman who has endless strength. But in reality, a hero in one’s heart is always a humble and simple man.
Heroes are often hopelessly idealistic, regardless of how many times have their ideas been demonized and flung aside. They are morally principled enough to strive their whole lives to uphold it, even at the cost of personal loss and sacrifice.
A few descriptions reoccur in “The Sweet Rebel: Remembering Fan Yew Teng”, a book edited by his twin daughter Pauline and Lilianne Fan, to commemorate the first anniversary of his passing. Fan was repeatedly described as the “Beacon of Light”, grassroot leader, principled, intellectual, daring, fearless, truly a simple man with a big heart.

Fan Yew Teng was a two-term Member of Parliament in Kampar and Menglembu, as well as Selangor assemblyman for Petaling Jaya. He was the editor of “The Educator”, the official organ of the National Union of Teachers (NUT), and later editor of The Rocket. He was also the co-organizer of the 1967 nationwide teachers' strike which demanded equal pay for female teachers, better housing and medical benefits, and pension after retirement for all teachers.
When Lim Kit Siang was detained under the Internal Security Act in 1969, Fan served as acting DAP Secretary-General, exercising the powers even before Lim, to keep the party from falling apart in the post-May 13 climate.
Fan later left DAP over differences in principle, yet he never turned his back on any injustice happening in Malaysia. He participated in a 1998 international forum against Lim Guan Eng’s unjust imprisonment.
When it came to race, Fan was truly “color blind”. He was amongst the first people to connect PAS to the Chinese community since the early eighties. He was also a well-known columnist in Harakah and Aliran.
Internationally, he founded Suaram and was concerned with many international issues, including the release of Aung San Suu Kyi. For him, human rights and the dignity of humanity cut across race and religion.
According to Petaling Jaya City Councillor Richard Yeoh, Fan’s victory over then Education Minister Dr. Mahathir in the Great Economic Debate at University Malaya in 1974, was probably the cause for Dr. Mahathir to withdraw universities’ autonomy with the amended University and University College Act (still in effect today).
Despite his huge achievements and contributions, one of the deepest impressions that Mr. Fan left to his beloved friends from all over the world, was his fondness for his typewriter, pipe and bicycle.
How could such a simple family man become a political target, be charged for an article he published in The Rocket, removed as the Member of Parliament and denied his parliamentary pension? I believe this was simply because Fan was true to himself.
Fan’s legacy was his big heart and his deep compassion to social justice. One does not have to know him in person to feel his passion and his ideas for a better Malaysia and a better world. This is what connected him and other giants like Lim Kit Siang, who have been and are still working selflessly for this cause.
Reading “The Sweet Rebel” made me feel how many lives that Fan impacted. I remembered Lim Kit Siang’s expression when he was sitting at the front row at the book launch of The Sweet Rebel: Remembering Fan Yew Teng. He was ever so calm and composed.
Lim looked at Fan’s face projected on the main screen backdrop, and he flipped through a copy of the book displayed on the table. He listened attentively when Pauline Fan and Ambiga gave their speeches; in the middle of the tribute he took out his glasses and wiped his eyes. In those 5 seconds as the camera focused on him, Lim raised his head up again as resolute as ever, with his glasses perched on his nose. That was the face of a man who lost a comrade and friend.
Fan may have felt that he had not done enough to make the world a better place. Even lying on the hospital bed, his concern was how to help others escape from suffering. Malaysia would not have come this far without the efforts and contributions by Fan and other first generation Malaysian rebels.
What makes a rebel a rebel? A strong, fearless, and principled soul. A great mind, great heart, great vision. As much as we mourn for his soul, Fan’s wishes for a better Malaysia are still valid today: “For how long more are Malaysians to live with fear and loathing? Afraid about the collapse of public safety even in broad daylight and disgusted by rising inflation and galloping corruption. How much longer? Surely it is in the hands of the Malaysian people themselves.” (in Harakah, December 2007).
I think that the best and only way to remember Fan Yew Teng, is to continue his mission to fulfil his dreams and ensure that the spirit of a Malaysian Malaysia lives on. 

This article was published at The Rocket, August 2012

Genta Media's official website - Editorial Diary 03/03 
Read more!